Greenwich Woman Testifies In Norwalk Cop’s Sex Assault Trial

Greenwich Woman Testifies In Norwalk Cop’s Sex Assault Trial

The alleged victim, now 20, took the witness stand and told the jury Anthony Santo stuck his hand down her pants and touched her sexually while her father and brother were sleeping next to them on the first day of a trial against a Norwalk police officer accused of sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl.

Santo seemed on without feeling given that girl described the incident at state Superior Court in Stamford. Santo ended up being an 18-year person in the Norwalk Police Department before October of 2009 as he ended up being arrested on fees of second-degree assault that is sexual chance of problems for a young child. He’s got been on unpaid administrative leave since their arrest.

The alleged victim stated Santo ended up being a friend that is close of household and spent lots of time at their property in Greenwich. The girl said she could inform Santo things she could perhaps maybe not discuss along with her “strict moms and dads” and described Santo as her “second daddy. “

The lady ended up being not able to identify the precise date of this attack, but stated she had been about 13 at that time. The witness stated she was at her pajamas sitting on a settee inside her family room and also the two might have been referring to masturbation or being groped by another child whenever Santo touched her. Your ex said there might have been an electric outage that night and her daddy and cousin was resting for a mattress within the family area if the event occurred.

The lady stated she did not inform anybody concerning the event until belated 2007, whenever she told her boyfriend.

During the time, your ex stated she had been therefore young she failed to realize something bad had happened, she immediately ran to the bathroom to collect herself although she said.

“I didn’t determine what was taking place, I didn’t comprehend the feelings I happened to be that is having did not understand it absolutely was incorrect. I did not know any single thing, ” she stated.

Right before the lady and Santo had been to simply just take a vacation together to Florida to consult with a family member of Santo’s in July 2009, the boyfriend called authorities and reported the intimate attack she described to him significantly more than per year earlier in the day.

Santo, who has got remained free on $25,000 bond since their arrest, would sometimes lean in to keep in touch with their lawyer, Gary Mastronardi, during the roughly 90 mins of testimony the lady offered each morning.

Moments after Mastronardi started their cross assessment, the lady started initially to cry as she ended up being expected in a stern tone why her daddy had been furious together with her after she made the allegation against Santo, a detailed buddy.

“He ended up being upset with you because he failed to think you. He did not think your tale, ” Mastronardi stated.

Judge Richard Comerford then provided your ex minutes that are several write by herself before continuing.

Whenever Mastronardi started once again, he asked to really have the exact same concern duplicated, but an objection to a follow-up led Comerford to clear the jury through the courtroom.

Prior to meal, Mastronardi outlined his strategy during a disagreement with senior Assistant State’s Attorney Maureen Ornousky about how exactly far to the woman’s dating history he will be able to get while protecting Santo.

Mastronardi stated he wished to phone witnesses to buttress their concept that the lady had made within the story concerning the assault that is sexual make her boyfriend jealous.

“My place is she managed to make it up. I am perhaps not wanting to soil her reputation, ” stated Mastronardi, incorporating that by doing this bid for envy, she dragged an innocent individual into a charge that is criminal.

Mastronardi stated while attempting to alert law enforcement from the situation, perhaps the woman’s daddy stated the boyfriend that is jealous Tony Santo involved with it. “

Mastronardi stated your ex had comprised another severe intimate allegation about another individual, but authorities selected to not ever prosecute the so-called perpetrator of the intimate assault considering that the story was so bizarre it might never be believed.

More witnesses is supposed to be called in the event likely to take the remaining portion of the to decide week.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.